SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
M.Sangeetha – Appellant
Versus
The Director Panchayat Union Middle School (PUMS), Chennai – Respondent
W.P.No.41115 of 2025 | W.M.P.No.46074 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Venkatesh
For the Respondents: Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru

Denial of maternity leave based solely on number of pregnancies violates constitutional rights.

Headnote:This Writ Petition was filed challenging the order dated 22.07.2025 rejecting maternity leave. The petitioner, a teacher employed since 2005, sought leave for her third child after two previous leaves. The Court noted that denying leave based solely on the number of pregnancies contradicts the rights afforded by law. The decision in prior cases reaffirmed maternity rights regardless of the number of births. The impugned order was set aside, granting the petitioner's leave request from 07.07.2025 to 06.07.2026 with benefits as per applicable rules.

Table of Content
1. maternity leave application and its denial details. (Para 3)
2. court's reaffirmation of maternity benefits irrespective of previous leave. (Para 5)
3. final decision to grant maternity leave with benefits. (Para 6)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the fourth respondent, thereby rejected the request made by the petitioner seeking Maternity Leave from 07.07.2025 to 06.07.2026.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Secondary Grade Assistant Teacher and joined service on 21.12.2005. She got married on 11.12.2009 and she gave birth to three daughters. Unfortunately, her elder daughter died. Thereafter, the petitioner gave birth to another child on 17.07.2025. Hence, she applied for maternity leave from 07.07.2025 to 06.07.2026. However, the said request was rejected on the ground that the petitioner had already availed maternity leave for her two daughters. Thereafter, once again the petitioner applied for maternity leave from 07.07.2025 and the same was rejected by an order dated 27.10.2025. 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as this Court have repeatedly held that a women Government employee would be entitled to seek maternity leave only twice during her service period. However, the said provision cannot be interpreted in such a manner as to empower the State to deny the maternity leave, even when it is sought for the first time, merely on the ground that it pertains to a third pregnancy. Maternity benefit is a constitutional right that cannot be denied for the birth of a third child.

5. A similar issue has already been dealt with by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.33559 of 2025, dated 04.09.2025, wherein this Court held as follows :

“6. The issue raised in this appeal is no more res integra in view of the pronouncement made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 1204, where also under similar circumstances for granting of maternity leave and maternity benefits for a mother who was pregnant third time since has been allowed by the writ Court which decision was reversed by the Division Bench of the High Court as against which when Special Leave Petition was preferred, having converted the same into Civil Appeal No.2526 of 2025, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said judgment cited supra has allowed the said Civil Appeal.

12. When that being so, it does not restrict to first pregnancy or second pregnancy and it cannot be stated that, she would not be entitled to get the relief to third pregnancy which would have no logic at all and thoroughly unreasonable. Therefore, we do feel that, in this case also since the petitioner though has given birth to two children already and she is under third pregnancy now, merely because it is the third pregnancy, such benefits of maternity leave and maternity benefits cannot be denied to the mother.”

6. In view of the above Judgment and by following the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as this Court, the order impugned in this writ petition cannot be sustained and is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the order of rejection of maternity leave passed by the third respondent is hereby set aside. The third and fourth respondents are directed to grant maternity leave to the petitioner for the period from 07.07.2025 to 06.07.2025 together with all consequential benefits, in accordance with the applicable rules, forthwith. 7. In the result, this Writ Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top