Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
B.Kuttiandy – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Bar Council of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims misconduct by second respondent. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. complaint motivated by revenge and requires proper examination. (Para 3) |
| 3. bar council directed to dispose of the complaint on merits. (Para 4) |
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar Standing counsel for R1 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to take cognizance of the complaint dated 01.09.2025 and to take action against the second respondent.
2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the second respondent, while securing the job as Police Constable in the Pondicherry Police Department, not disclosed the fact that he has already enrolled as an advocate and has simply stated his degree as B.A.B.L. and had been working as Police Constable and only recently, he has filed an application to cancel his enrollment, after 15 years. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the second respondent has committed serious misconduct and action to be taken to debar the second respondent.
3. A careful perusal of the complaint would clearly indicate that the complaint has been preferred only in order
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
