Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
Mr.R.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner alleges misconduct based on criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observed the complaints are motivated and lack basis for action. (Para 4 , 5) |
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jeevanandhanam For Respondents : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar Standing counsel for R1 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to take action against the second respondent for his professional misconduct.
2. According to the petitioner, the second respondent, who has enrolled as an Advocate on 31.07.2025, is facing several criminal proceedings viz., FIR No.191 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC read with Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment (Prevention) Act, FIR No.251 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 323 of IPC and FIR No.260 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC and therefore, seeks for action against the second respondent for his misconduct.
3. We have carefully perused the entire materials.
4. A careful perusal of the first information report clearly indicates that due to some trivial disputes, compla
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
