Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Satish Seshadri – Appellant
Versus
The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Shooligiri, Krishangiri District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's property rights affirmed (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. application for survey mandates administrative duties (Para 2) |
| 3. court directive to respondents on property survey (Para 4) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 25.08.2025 wherein the petitioner is seeking for survey of the subject property and for demarcation of boundaries.
2. Heard Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, learned counsel for petitioner, Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate [crl.side] appearing for third respondent.
3. The petitioner is claiming right and title over the subject property by virtue of a settlement deed dated 01.06.2023. The petitioner is also placing reliance upon the patta issued in the name of the petitioner in Patta No.20726. The petitioner submitted an application on 25.08.2025 seeking survey of the subject property and for demarcation of boundaries. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.
4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
