IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
M/S. BADRINATH COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION – Respondent
Order
With consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a mandamus to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's Appeal dated
12.12.2023 within a time frame.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that aggrieved by the order passed by the fourth respondent, the petitioner filed an Appeal before the first respondent on 12.12.2023 and since the said Appeal evoked no response, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of filing this Writ Petition, seeking for the aforementioned relief.
3.1 It is submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.1 to dispose of the Appeal pending before him within a stipulated time.
4. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has submitted that the Appeal filed by the petitioner would be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the limited scope of the prayer, sought for by the petitioner, in this Writ Petition, this Court, without expressing any view with regar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.