Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
G.Harshini D/o. V.S. Gopinath, No.52, New Street, Mannadi, Chennai-600 001 – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of General Health Services (DGHS) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. presentation of writ petitions for nri quota consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. clarification regarding sponsorship affidavit and bank account details. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's rationale to allow processing despite documentation errors. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. emphasis on the specificity and non-precedential nature of the ruling. (Para 7) |
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioners wherein the petitioners have requested to include their names in the eligibility list for NRI quota published on 04.11.2025 by the 1st respondent and to permit the petitioner to participate in the NEET PG counselling to be held from 06.11.2025 to 08.11.2025 or on any other future date under the NRI category in the All India quota.
2. When these writ petitions came up for hearing yesterday, this Court directed the learned Senior Central Government panel counsel to take instructions from the respondents and to list the matter for hearing today.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Senior Central Government Panel Counsel submitted that the affidavit of sponsorship was given to both the pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
