SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
S.Stellabai – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police Madurai City – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.P.Rajan
For the Respondents:Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 03.12.2022, passed by the first respondent, under which the punishment imposed on the petitioner has been enhanced suo moto by imposing the punishment of postponement of next increment for a period of one year, which shall not operate to postpone for future increments from the punishment of censure awarded by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, North, Madurai City, on 06.06.2022.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order, on the ground that by total non-application of mind to Rule 15A of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, which, according to the petitioner, provides for holding of an enquiry before enhancing the punishment, has not been followed while passing the impugned order dated 03.12.2022. The petitioner was earlier imposed with the punishment of censure by the second respondent on 06.06.2022. The same has been enhanced suo moto pursuant to the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 03.12.2022 i.e., the punishment of ensure has been enhanced to the punishment of postponement of next increment for a period of one year, which shall no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top