IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
O R D E R
By relying on a sale deed dated 12.06.2013 (Doc.No.1846 of 2013)
and patta No.7492, the petitioner had applied for the survey of land in survey Nos.497/3, 497/5, 497/2, 497/2A1 and 497/4. The persent Writ Petition relates thereto.
2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the fourth respondent. Learned Government Advocate states that the online application and fees were paid only in respect of three survey numbers, namely, 497/2A1, 497/3A and 497/4A1.
3. From the sale deed relied upon by the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner has purchased 3 cents from his vendor, Kasi. Patta No.7492 is a joint patta issued in the names of ten persons, including the petitioner. This joint patta pertains only to survey No.497/3A. As regards survey No.497/2A1, the patta corresponding thereto is patta No.3783, which also stands in the names of about eight persons. Survey No. 497/4A1, which is also sought to be surveyed, is not supported by any revenue record. In these circumstances, an inquiry has to be undertaken before taking a decision.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.