SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
W.P(MD)No. 31910 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. R.Anand
For the Respondents: Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman, Mr.S.Prakash

Court directed an inquiry into the survey request due to insufficient revenue records and advisement of notice to joint pattadars.

Headnote:This case involves a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India concerning a land survey. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondents to conduct a survey of land based on a sale deed and joint patta documentation. The court found the need for inquiries due to discrepancies in property records and directed the respondents to notify joint pattadars before making a decision. The conclusion mandates the survey inquiry with a timeline of three months for a response.

Table of Content
1. inquiry into land ownership and survey request. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. directs survey inquiry to be conducted. (Para 4)

O R D E R

By relying on a sale deed dated 12.06.2013 (Doc.No.1846 of 2013)

and patta No.7492, the petitioner had applied for the survey of land in survey Nos.497/3, 497/5, 497/2, 497/2A1 and 497/4. The persent Writ Petition relates thereto.

2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the fourth respondent. Learned Government Advocate states that the online application and fees were paid only in respect of three survey numbers, namely, 497/2A1, 497/3A and 497/4A1.

3. From the sale deed relied upon by the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner has purchased 3 cents from his vendor, Kasi. Patta No.7492 is a joint patta issued in the names of ten persons, including the petitioner. This joint patta pertains only to survey No.497/3A. As regards survey No.497/2A1, the patta corresponding thereto is patta No.3783, which also stands in the names of about eight persons. Survey No. 497/4A1, which is also sought to be surveyed, is not supported by any revenue record. In these circumstances, an inquiry has to be undertaken before taking a decision.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the second and third respondents to conduct an inquiry in relation to the petitioner's request for a survey after issuing notice to the joint pattadars in respect of all three survey numbers sought to be surveyed. After providing a reasonable opportunity to such joint pattadars and considering objections, if any, from them, a speaking order shall be issued within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

NCS : Yes/No 11.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To

1. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 3. The Firka Surveyor, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Ottapidaram Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.

apd ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 31910 of 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top