Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
J.Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to survey land based on valid ownership documents. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. no contesting claims to ownership. (Para 2) |
| 3. government's obligation to respond timely. (Para 3) |
| 4. court directive on survey completion. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
By relying on three sale deeds executed in the year 1971 in favour of the petitioner's mother and a Will dated 17.11.1985 bequeathing the subject property (Schedule B) in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner had applied for a survey of lands in survey No.9/4A1A8 at Arumbanur Bit-II village. The present Writ Petition relates thereto.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed on record death certificate of the petitioner's mother. On instructions, he confirms that there is no rival title claim.
3. Learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the third respondent. Learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the survey would be carried out within twelve (12)
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. The petitioner has placed on record the title documents under which his mother purchased the property. Also on record i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
