Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
M.Sagupar Sathik – Appellant
Versus
The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. classification of land ownership and discrepancies in government records. (Para 2) |
| 2. acknowledgment of waqf property and necessity for rectifying records. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive for prompt action on the petitioner's request. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
The property in survey No.183/3 was classified in the UDR records as 'Ryotwari Punjai' and the name of the pattadar was recorded as Pallivasal under patta No.458. Patta No.458 reflects the name of the Pallivasal through its mutavalli. The Chitta and Adangal also contain similar entries. On the ground that the said property was erroneously reflected as 'Sarkar Poramboke' in the Town Survey Land Register and the utilization was shown as a vacant land, the petitioner had applied for rectification. The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the early disposal of such request.
2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents to
2 to 6 and learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for the first respondent. Learned standing counsel for the first respondent confirms that the property is recorded as Waqf property in the records of the Wakf Board. Learned Government advocate submits that the petitioner's request w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
