Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, C.Kumarappan, JJ
R.Hemalatha – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Town and Country Planning Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against municipal order without prior notice (Para 1 , 3 , 10) |
| 2. history of unauthorized development on public land (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. justification for issuing orders despite lack of notice (Para 11 , 13) |
| 4. permit response to earlier orders as notices (Para 15 , 17) |
| 5. final resolution and direction for further proceedings (Para 18) |
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
Mr.D.Selvanayagam, learned counsel, who appears for the petitioners and Mr.J.Ashok, learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 and Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Additional Advocate General, who appears on behalf of Mr.K.Balasubramani, learned Standing Counsel for R3 & R4 state in unison that the order passed in WP(MD)No.30725 of 2025 dated 30.10.2025 may be passed in the present case. That order reads as follows:-
'This is a batch of writ petitions. We have heard Mr.B.Saravanan, learned Senior Counsel, who appears on behalf of M/s.Ajmal Associates for the petitioners, Mr.J.Ashok, and Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 and Mr.R.Baskaran, learned Additional Advocate General, who appears on behalf of Mr.K.Balasubramani, learned Standing Couns
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
