SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65353

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ
J.John Arockiadoss – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Collectorate, Dindigul – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.32213 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.U.Antony Santhosh
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Sarangan (R1 to R3), Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen (R4 & R5)

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner chooses not to pursue the matter further.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate action against the 6th respondent for illegal and unauthorized construction. The court noted that the petitioner has decided not to pursue the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

Mr.U.Antony Santhosh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes an endorsement to the effect that this writ petition is not pursued, recording which, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon