Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, JJ
The Registrar, Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha University – Appellant
Versus
S.Sreekantan Nair – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. refund eligibility based on course recognition. (Para 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. refund conditions as per prospectus. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. policy adoption and retrospective approval. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court directive for compliance with refund policy. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. final verdict allowing the writ appeals. (Para 14) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
Writ appeals have been instituted challenging common order passed by writ Court in a batch of writ petitions on 01.08.2018.
2. Writ petitioners/students instituted writ petitions seeking refund of fee paid by them to appellant/Saveetha School of Law on the ground that the appellant admitted students to Law course without recognition from the Bar Council of India.
3. Writ Court adjudicated the issues and granted relief by directing appellant to repay the entire fee collected from writ petitioners.
4. Mr.P.Wilson, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of appellant would mainly contend that as per prospectus, refund policy had been agreed between college management and students. Since they have agreed to refund policy and given an undertaking, they are bound by the conditions stipulated and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
