SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.SURENDER, J
Mallika – Appellant
Versus
Dr. R.Thamizh Vendan, The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. – Respondent
Cont P No. 2898 of 2024 | W.P.No. 13040 of 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.S.Parthasarathy
For the Respondents: Mr. C.Prakasam for R1, Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, AAG assisted by M/s.R.L.Karthika, GA for R2

The court affirms that compliance with prior orders can be enforced through contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This contempt petition under the order in W.P.No.13040 of 2016 dated 20.07.2023 seeks to enforce compliance. The respondents indicate compliance contingent on the petitioners contacting the relevant office. As the respondents consented to pay the amount, the petition is dismissed with the option of reopening for grievances. The petition is concluded with liberty granted for future recourse.

Table of Content
1. this contempt petition seeks enforcement of a prior court order. (Para 1)
2. respondents acknowledged the order and indicated willingness to comply. (Para 2 , 4)
3. petition is closed due to respondents' commitment to comply. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)

ORDER

This contempt petition is filed by the petitioners against the respondents, aggrieved by the non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.

13040 of 2016 dated 20.07.2023.

2. The first respondent, Dr.R.Thamizh Vendan, and the second respondent, Mr.T.Dakshinmoorthy, Secretary to Government, Agricultural Department are present before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders will be complied with once the petitioners contacts the Controller of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, in person.

4. The letter dated 06.11.2025 addressed by the Registrar of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University to the first petitioner is filed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the respondents have undertaken to pay the amount, the Contempt Petition may be closed.

6. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Petition is closed. Liberty is granted to the petitioners, to approach this Court in the event of any grievance regarding non-compliance of the order dated 20.07.2023, in W.P.No.13040 of

2016. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top