SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65366

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Nirmal Kumar, J
R.Prabhakaran – Appellant
Versus
M.Balamurugan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Manoharan
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Guruprasad

JUDGMENT

The appellant as complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in S.T.C.No.65 of 2015 before the learned II Additional District Munsif, Bhavani (trial Court) against the respondent/accused. The trial Court by judgment dated 10.01.2017 convicted the respondent and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one year and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.7,00,000/- as compensation to the respondent in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months, for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 . Challenging the same, the respondent preferred an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Bhavani (lower appellate Court) in Crl.A.No.39 of 2017 and the same was allowed by judgment dated 21.02.2018 setting aside the judgment of the trial Court, aggrieved over the same, the present Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant.

2.For clarity, the appellant and respondent are referred to as complainant and accused respectively as per the complaint.

3.Gist of the case is that the complainant and accused are friends, the accused borrowed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- from the complainant on 27.11.201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top