ORDER

The petitioner/Central Bureau of Investigation filed this Criminal Original Petition challenging the impugned order dated 20.07.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.2453 of 2022 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 passed by the learned XIV Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai.

2.Brief facts of the case is that the 1^st respondent/A1 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.2453 of 2022 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 to direct the EPFO/New Delhi to produce the note order file pertaining to sanction order (Ex.P9). In this case, charge sheet filed by the petitioner against the 1^st respondent and his family members arraying them as A1 to A6. The 1^st respondent, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Grade-I, Zonal ACC Office, Bangalore, a public servant during the check period 01.01.2010 to 17.01.2016 acquired disproportionate assets intentionally aided and abetted by his wife, son, father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister to the tune of Rs.4,28,50,092/-. During trial, witnesses examined and documents produced. PW5 is the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, New Delhi who authenticated the sanction order (Ex.P9) issued by the Chairman, Central Board of Trustees (CBT), Employees Provident Fund. PW5 exami