Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Shri S.Durga Prasad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and disproportionate assets (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the sanction order validity (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's review of the sanctioning authority process (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court sets aside the impugned order (Para 20) |
| 5. final ruling on the petition (Para 21) |
ORDER
The petitioner/Central Bureau of Investigation filed this Criminal Original Petition challenging the impugned order dated 20.07.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.2453 of 2022 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 passed by the learned XIV Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai.
2.Brief facts of the case is that the 1st respondent/A1 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.2453 of 2022 in C.C.No.6 of 2018 to direct the EPFO/New Delhi to produce the note order file pertaining to sanction order (Ex.P9). In this case, charge sheet filed by the petitioner against the 1st respondent and his family members arraying them as A1 to A6. The 1st respondent, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Grade-I, Zonal ACC Office, Bangalore, a public servant during the check period 01.01.2010 to 17.01.2016 acquired disproportionate assets intentionally aided and abetted by his wife, son, father-in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
