Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
S.Arulmozhi – Appellant
Versus
The Taluk Tahsildar, Chenglepet Taluk – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding the evidence of pw.1 and the closure of the trial. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the representation and willingness of parties to continue the trial. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. outcome directing a fresh opportunity for cross-examination. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the B-Diary Order passed by the Trial Court closing the evidence of PW.1 and adjourning the matter for further evidence of plaintiff side, by its order dated 12.08.2025 in O.S.No.10 of 2021.
2. It is seen from the impugned order PW.1 was cross examined by defendants 1 to 5 and the matter was posted for cross examination of PW.1 by 6th defendant. At that stage, the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff expressed her disinterest in continuing with trial and the recording the same, the Trial Court closed the evidence of PW.1 and adjourned the matter for examination of other witnesses. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/plaintiff has come before this Court.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel appear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
