Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Sounthar, J
K.Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
A.Devarajan (deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court maintains that the suit's focus on possession does not extend to rental payments. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. the petitioner filed for an injunction based on a lease agreement. (Para 2) |
| 3. the appellate court's reference to fair rent was deemed baseless due to lack of evidence. (Para 4) |
| 4. the court dismissed the civil revision petition while preserving the petitioner's rights in future proceedings. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the First Appellate Court dismissing the application in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in A.S.No.344 of 2024 filed by the petitioner/appellant seeking permission to deposit monthly rent of Rs.1,000/- from January-2025 to till the date of disposal of the appeal suit.
2. The petitioner herein filed a suit for bare injunction on the strength of the Lease Deed dated 19.01.1989 with original owner of the property one R.Nesarajan. The respondents herein claiming themselves as Legal Representatives of R.Nesarajan attempted to interfere with the possession of the petitioner and hence, he was constrained to file a suit for bare injunction. The said suit was dismissed by the Trial Court and aggrieved by the same
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
