The court clarified procedural obligations regarding document marking in civil proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.No.5495 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.27637 of 2025 Jayabal ... Petitioner vs.

Perumal ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the Docket order passed on 17.09.2025 in I.A.No.226 of 2021 in O.S.No.280 of 2013 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sankaranarayanan

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the Docket Order passed by the Principal District Munsif Court, Tindivanam in I.A.No.226 of

2021 in O.S.No.280 of 2013, dated 17.09.2025.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by impugned docket order the Trial Court permitted the respondent/1^st defendant to mark a koor chit, which was unregistered and unstamped.

3. A perusal of the impugned docket order would suggest that nowhere in the order dated 17.09.2025, the Trial Court referred about the marking of alleged koor chit. The Trial Court only permitted the 1^st defendant to lead evidence and adjourned the matter to 22.09.2025. The petitioner cannot be aggrieved by the order dated 17.09.2025 permitting the 1^st defendant to lead evidence. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the marking of the alleged koor chit, it is for him to challenge the order passed by the Trial Court permitting marking of the said document.

4. With this clarification, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm To The Principal District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm