Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Sounthar, J
K.Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of trial court's order (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's claims of serious objections (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observation on petitioner's strategy (Para 4) |
| 4. dismissal with liberty to file fresh application (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court allowing the application in I.A.No.4 of 2024 in O.S.No.138 of 2012 filed by the respondents seeking to set aside the exparte order passed against them dated 30.01.2013.
2. A reading of the impugned order would suggest that the petitioner did not raise any serious objection for allowing the application to set aside the exparte order and hence, the application filed by the respondents was allowed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner stoutly opposed the application to set aside the exparte order by filing counter and additional counter and the same was not at all taken into consideration by the Court below.
4. If the recording of the Trial Court that petitioner did not raise any serious objection against allowing of the application to set aside the exparte order is not correct, the proper course for the petitioner is to ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
