IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
M/s.Sree Dhaksha Property Developers (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Protect Coatings – Respondent
O R D E R
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court allowing the application in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in Filing No.COS.No. 85 of 2025 filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking to condone the delay of 112 days in representing the returned plaint.
2. The plaint was submitted by the respondent seeking recovery of money against the petitioner. The plaint was returned on 12.02.2025 raising certain objections. The plaint was represented with a delay of 112 days. In the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, it was stated by the respondent/plaintiff that in order to address the queries raised in the returned plaint, the respondent/plaintiff had to obtain statement of accounts from the Banker and Certificate under Sections 61 to 63 BSA for email communications and in the said process, the delay had occurred. Having satisfied with the reason assigned in the affidavit, the Trial Court condoned the delay of 112 days in representing the returned plaint. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/defendant has come before Court.
3. It is seen from the records the delay in representation of unnumbered plaint has been condoned by the Trial Court. B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.