SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
Vennila W/o.Manjunath – Appellant
Versus
Chandru @ Azhagu S/o.Srinivasan – Respondent
HCP No. 2320 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. S.Deva Anbu
For the Respondents: Mr. A.Damodaran, Mr.M.Karthikeyan

The court clarified that an adult's elopement does not constitute illegal detention under Habeas Corpus principles.

Headnote:The court examined a Habeas Corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, where the petitioner sought the production of her daughter who has been missing since 27.10.2025. The court noted that after a complaint was filed, the police registered FIR No. 327/2025 but the daughter has not been traced. The respondents submitted that she has eloped with the third respondent and since she is a major, this is not a case of illegal detention. Consequently, the court ordered to continue the investigation and produce the girl before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's daughter is missing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for investigation and closure of petition. (Para 4 , 5)

(Order of the Court was made by N.Sathish Kumar J.)

The petitioner seeks production of her daughter, Ms.M.Amirthavarshini, aged about 18 years.

2. According to the petitioner, her daughter left the house on 27.10.2025 and despite search, they could not locate her. In this regard, she gave a complaint, which resulted in registration of the First Information Report in Crime No.327 of 2025 for “Woman Missing” by the second respondent.

However, the whereabouts of the missing daughter have not been traced as on date. Hence, the petitioner seeks production of her daughter.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents

1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner's daughter had eloped with the third respondent. Since she is a major, it is submitted that it is a case of elopement and she is not under any illegal detention.

4. Let the respondent continue the investigation and produce the girl before the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate.

5. With the above observation and directions, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top