Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J
V. Pankajam – Appellant
Versus
No Respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. gardianship for mentally retarded person. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court establishes suitability of the petitioner. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner is appointed as guardian. (Para 6) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL O.P. No.393 of 2025 V.Pankajam ... Petitioner PRAYER: Original Petition is filed under Clause 17 of Letters Patent to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person and manager of the property of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi.B.Arunasri and permit the petitioner to receive the benefits of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri.
For Petitioner : Mr. E.Senthilkumar
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Clause 17 of Letters Patent to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person and manager of the property of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi.B.Arunasri and permit the petitioner to receive the benefits of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri.
2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner and the mother of the mentally retarded person, viz., C.B.Renuga are sisters. The petitioner is the maternal aunt of the mentally retarded person Selvi. B.Arunasri. The petitioner's sister, C.B.Renuga married to one Balasubraman
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
