SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65404

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J
V. Pankajam – Appellant
Versus
No Respondent – Respondent
O.P. No.393 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. E.Senthilkumar

The court established that familial relationships and absence of adverse interests may justify guardianship for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Headnote:{Statute Analysis: The petition is filed under Clause 17 of the Letters Patent enabling the appointment of a guardian with responsibilities towards a mentally retarded individual. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, as the maternal aunt, seeks guardianship of Selvi B.Arunasri, who has significant intellectual disabilities.

Findings of Court:
The court found the petitioner suitable and without adverse interest to serve as the guardian for the welfare of the individual in question.

Issues: The court framed the question as to the appropriateness of granting guardianship for the welfare of a mentally retarded person.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the absence of adverse interests and the familial relationship justified the petitioner's request for guardianship.

Result: This original petition is allowed, appointing the petitioner as guardian of the mentally retarded person, Selvi B.Arunasri, and permitting her to receive benefits for the individual’s well-being.}

Table of Content
1. gardianship for mentally retarded person. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court establishes suitability of the petitioner. (Para 3 , 5)
3. petitioner is appointed as guardian. (Para 6)

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL O.P. No.393 of 2025 V.Pankajam ... Petitioner PRAYER: Original Petition is filed under Clause 17 of Letters Patent to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person and manager of the property of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi.B.Arunasri and permit the petitioner to receive the benefits of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri.

For Petitioner : Mr. E.Senthilkumar

ORDER

This petition has been filed under Clause 17 of Letters Patent to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person and manager of the property of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi.B.Arunasri and permit the petitioner to receive the benefits of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri.

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner and the mother of the mentally retarded person, viz., C.B.Renuga are sisters. The petitioner is the maternal aunt of the mentally retarded person Selvi. B.Arunasri. The petitioner's sister, C.B.Renuga married to one Balasubramaniam and out of their wedlock, Arunasri was born on 21.05.1974 and from her childhood, her intelligence quotient level was 35% and her intellectual disability was 65% and now the mentally retarded person is aged 51 years. The husband of the petitioner, viz., Dr.C.S.Viswanathan and the father of the mentally retarded person, viz., C.Balasubramaniam are own brothers. The petitioner's sister, who is the mother of the mentally retarded person, died on 14.02.2019 and thereafter, father of the mentally retarded person was taking care of her and he died on 15.04.2025. The petitioner's husband, viz., Dr.C.S.Viswanathan, brother of C.Balasubramaniam pre-deceased him on 03.12.2015 leaving the petitioner herein and his only son, viz., C.V.Shavankumar, as his only Class-I Legal heirs. Initially the mentally retarded person was granted a sum of Rs.400/- per month towards financial aid under the scheme for financial assistance to the disabled persons, vide proceedings of the Special Tahsildar Diasaster Relief Project, Chennai and the said amount was periodically enhanced and now, Rs.3,000/- is granted towards financial aid and the same was withdrawn for the welfare of the mentally retarded person. After the death of the parents of the mentally retarded person, the petitioner, who is the maternal aunt is the only caretaker of the said person and she is in a good position having good character to take care of the mentally retarded person. For the welfare and benefit of the mentally retarded person, Guardianship certificate is necessary to receive the benefits of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri and the petitioner has absolutely no adverse interest against her sister's daughter, Selvi B.Arunasri, who is a mentally retarded person. Therefore, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking permission to appoint her as guardian of the person and manager of the property of the mentally retarded person, viz., Selvi B.Arunasri.

3. After filing of this petition, paper publication was effected and no any objection from any party. Thereafter, the matter was posted for examination of witnesses. On the side of the petitioner, P.W.1 was examined and exhibits Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.11 were marked.

4. This Court also perused the evidence and the entire records.

5. As per the evidence of P.W.1 and the documents Ex.P.1. to Ex.P.11, revealed that the petitioner is the maternal aunt of the mentally retarded person. The parents of the mentally retarded person are no more and the petitioner being the maternal aunt, is the only care-taker of the mentally retarded person. Therefore, it is quite possible for the petitioner to find it difficult to maintain herself and the mentally retarded person. There is no any adverse interest against the mentally retarded person and the permiss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top