Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Vijayakumar, J
Santhanam – Appellant
Versus
Sankaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial judgments and appeals regarding title and encroachment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disputed property ownership and attempted encroachment on plaintiff's land. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. trial court findings on encroachment and plaintiff's rightful title. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. reversal of trial court’s adjustment decree by the appellate court. (Para 15 , 16 , 31) |
| 5. final dismissal of second appeals affirming appellate court findings. (Para 32) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The plaintiff in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction has preferred S.A.(MD).No.495 of 2011 challenging the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court.
2.SA(MD).No.496 of 2011 has been filed by the first defendant in a suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction challenging the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court.
(A).Pleadings of the parties before the Courts below are as follows:
3.The plaintiff in O.S.No.435 of 1996 has contended that he had purchased the suit schedule property of 16 ¼ cents out of 18.10 acres in Survey No.44/1 under a sale de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
