SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
Padmavathy D/o. Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
Rajin Bhagavathi S/o. Thangaraj – Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition (Tr.C.M.P.) No.390 of 2025 | C.M.P. No.10693 of 2025 | HMOP No.51 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Rajeshwaran

The court recognizes the difficulties faced by a party in traveling for court hearings and allows transfer to ensure fair access to justice.

Headnote:The petitioner has filed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to transfer H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2025 pending in Vallioor to Srivaiguntam due to travel constraints. The petition was warranted as the petitioner faced challenges traveling over 180 km. The court notes that mediation was attempted but failed. Given the circumstances involving the petitioner’s difficulties and the implications of traveling for hearings, the petition is allowed, and the case is transferred as requested.

Table of Content
1. transfer petition filed due to travel difficulties. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. mediation efforts initiated but failed. (Para 6)
3. court considers arguments of both parties. (Para 7 , 8)
4. transfer of the case is ordered. (Para 9)

O R D E R

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2025 pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District, and transfer the same to the file of Sub Court, Srivaiguntam, Tuticorin District.

2.Heard Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Rajeshwaran, learned Counsel for the respondent.

3.The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband and their marriage was solemnized on 22.02.2019, according to Hindu rites and customs. Out of their wedlock, they were blessed with two children, namely, Sara and Saravanan, aged about 4 and 1 year respectively. Due to difference of opinion, the respondent/husband has filed H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2025 before the Sub-Court, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District, seeking divorce. Seeking transfer of the above H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2025 from the file of Sub-Court, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District to the file of Sub Court, Srivaiguntam, Tuticorin District, the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed.

4.Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that being a lady, it is very difficult for the petitioner to travel more than 180 kms., approximately up and down from Thoothukudi to Valliyoor, for all the Court hearings and also she do not have any finance to meet the travel and other incidental expenses. Thus, he prays that this Court may transfer the case in HMOP.No.51 of 2025 from the file of the Sub-Court, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District to the file of Sub Court, Srivaiguntam, Tuticorin District.

5.The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated

08.08.2025, referring the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench, had passed the following order, :-

“Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent would submit that the matter may be referred to mediation for resolving the issue.

2.Considering the request of the both side counsel, this matter is referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, attached to this Bench. 3.Both the parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre on 22.08.2025. In the mean time, the Mediation Centre shall appoint a mediator in this case. The Mediator is directed to submit a report on or before

19.09.2025.

4.Registry is directed to list the matter before this Court

22.09.2025, along with report.

5.Interim order already granted by this Court dated 10.07.2025 is extended until further orders. ”

6.After mediation, The Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench had filed its report, dated 22.09.2025, which is already on record, and as per the mediation report, dated 22.09.2025, it is seen that the mediation failed and no agreement was reached between the parties.

7.Mr.K.Rajeshwaran, learned counsel for the respondent has made submissions, opposing to transfer the matrimonial case filed by the respondent in HMOP.No.51 of 2025, as prayed for by the petitioner, as it is also equally inconvenience for the respondent to attend all the Court hearings before the Court, to which, the matrimonial case filed by him, is now sought to be transferred by the petitioner.

8.Accordingly, after considering the arguments as advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the petitioner, being a lady, would be facing difficulty to travel about more than 180 kms approximately up and down to attend all the Court hearings before the Sub-Court, Vallioor, Tirunelveli District, where the HMOP.No.51 of 2025 is pending and that she is also facing finance constraint to meet travel and incidental expenses and also considering the fact that though the matter was referred to the Mediation a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top