SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. MALA, J
G.Nagaraj – Appellant
Versus
K.Kannan – Respondent
WP No. 21582 of 2021 | WMP NO. 22783 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Raghunathan for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co.
For the Respondents: M/s. P.SARAVANA SOWMIYAN FOR R1

Consent to accept reduced compensation in lieu of awarded amount is valid if mutually agreed upon.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the Labour Court's award dated 30.10.2018, which ordered compensation for illegal termination. The court allowed the petitioner to pay Rs.50,000, consenting to reduce the originally awarded amount. The main issues revolved around the legality of the termination and the compensation awarded. The court found the consent to accept a lesser amount appropriate given the circumstances. The petition was disposed of directing disbursement of Rs.50,000 to the first respondent.

Table of Content
1. court reviews the validity of the labour court's award for termination dispute. (Para 1 , 2)
2. consent to accept lesser compensation agreed upon by parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

ORDER

(1)The writ petition is filed to quash the impugned Award dated 30.10.2018, made in ID.No.117/2010, passed by the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore.

(2)The 1st respondent raised a dispute against the illegal termination by the 2nd respondent. The Labour Court, on 30.10.2018, passed the impugned Award in ID.No.117/2010, directing the petitioner and the 2nd respondent to pay compensation of Rs.60,000/- to the 1st respondent. Aggrieved by the Award passed by the Labour Court, in the aforesaid ID, the petitioner filed the above writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

(3)When the matter was taken up for hearing earlier on 04.11.2025, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that by order dated 06.10.2021, this Court, at the time of admission, directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- before the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore, in ID.No.117/2010. The learned counsel further submitted that the said amount was deposited and the 1st respondent may be permitted to withdraw Rs.50,000/- towards full and final compensation amount in stead of Rs.60,000/-, awarded by the Labour Court.

(4)The learned counsel for the 1st respondent also sought time to file an affidavit in support of the above submission.

(5)Today, the 1st respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he consents to receive Rs.50,000/- towards full and final compensation amount in stead of Rs.60,000/- awarded by the Labour Court, with a permission to withdraw the said amount deposited before the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore.

In view of the affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, the writ petition is (6)

disposed of with a direction to the Principal Labour Court, Coimbatore, to disburse the amount of Rs.50,000/- lying to its credit in ID.No.117//2010, to the 1st respondent, upon the 1st respondent filing appropriate application for withdrawal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top