Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
P.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Office Of Ranipet – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of familial ownership and historical property use. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by counsel for both parties. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's observations on proper procedural action. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's directives on approaching the appropriate authority. (Para 7) |
| 5. writ petition disposed with specific orders. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the
3rd respondent dated 04.07.2025 and for a consequential direction to the 4th respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner with respect to the subject property.
2. Heard Mr.R.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Ravichandran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the subject property belonged to his great grand father. Thereafter, the grand father of the petitioner and the other villagers constructed a temple in a portion of the land and it was maintained by all of them. However, the revenue records were continued in the individual names and not in the name of the temple.
4. During the UDR proceedings, the patta was assigned in favour of some of the third parties, who had nothin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
