SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
G.Santhanapathy – Appellant
Versus
The Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Richardson Wilson
For the Respondents: Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu

We find that the petition, in essence, is based on allegation that the order of this court is not being complied with and there is willful disobedience.

If that be so, this can be dealt with in contempt jurisdiction and repeated orders are not required to be passed in successive petitions issuing same direction time and again.

Writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file contempt petition.

There shall be no order as to costs. WMP No No.46621 of 2025 filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition is allowed subject to payment of separate court fee within two weeks, failing which this order shall be made applicable only to the first petitioner. Other interim application stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top