Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
GANAPATHYASAMY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for pipeline repairs and water restoration. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent's confirmation of restoration. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court concludes no further orders required as relief granted. (Para 4) |
ORDER
I have given a direction on 04.11.2025 to the respondents to restore the water supply which had been damaged on account of the fault pipeline.
2. when the matter was called today, Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam, learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the fault pipeline has been rectified and water connection has been restored.
3. The instructions given by the Block Development Officer to the Government Pleader is scanned and extracted hereunder:-
4. As the relief sought for by the petitioner has been granted by the respondent themselves, no further orders are necessary. The Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
