IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.SARAVANAN, J
Nandanee Steel Corporation – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, RANGE IV:THIRUVOTTIYUR DIVISION – Respondent
W.P.No.42018 of 2025 | W.M.P.Nos.47060 and 47063 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tax order on input credit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court finds no procedural irregularities. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner directed to appeal with conditions. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is before this Court challenging the impugned order passed in Order-in-Original No. 15/2024-25 (GST) by the respondent. By the said impugned order, the demand proposed in the notice preceding the aforesaid order has been confirmed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has complied with all the requirements of the provisions under Sections 16 of the respective GST Enactment Act, and therefore is entitled to a valid input tax credit. However, since the supplier failed to make payment, the petitioner has now been directed to reverse the input tax credit availed on such transactions.
3. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that it is a detailed order which has considered the petitioner’s reply and the provisions of the GST Enactment. Therefore, there appears to be no scope for interference with the impugned order, as no procedural irregularity or infirmity has noticed warranting an interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.
4. It is further observed that the petitioner ought to have challenged the impugned order before the Additional/Joint Commissioner (Appeals-I), Chennai–34. Considering that the petitioner intends to challenge the impugned order, liberty is granted to the petitioner to do so by filing a statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority, namely the Joint Commissioner (Appeals-I), Chennai–34, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, together with a deposit of 50% of the disputed tax amount.
5. In the event the petitioner complies with the above stipulation, the Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal and dispose of the same on merits, without reference to the limitation period. However, if the petitioner fails to comply with the above stipulation, it shall be deemed that this Writ Petition stands dismissed in limine, in which case the respondent shall be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax dues as per the impugned order.
6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.Ps. are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.