SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65442

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
T.Anbarasan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, The Revenue Tahsildar, The Firka Surveyor, The Inspector Of Police – Respondent
WP No. 42027 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Bharath Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Arumugam, Mr.L.Baskaran

The court may compel administrative authorities to fulfill their statutory duties regarding land survey and title determination.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: This judgment pertains to the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Facts of the Case: The petitioner claims rights over property via a duly registered sale deed and seeks survey and boundary demarcation.

Findings of Court:
The court directs the respondents to process the petitioner's application and conduct the necessary survey within eight weeks.

Issues: The main issue is whether the respondents ought to conduct the survey as requested.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasons that given the prior application and lack of response, the direction is justified.

Result: The court disposes of the writ petition with directions for action as stipulated.

Table of Content
1. property rights and request for administrative action. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. assessment of parties' arguments in procedural matters. (Para 2)
3. directive for conduct of survey and decisions on land claims. (Para 5)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to act upon the representation made by the petitioner on 27.09.2025, wherein the petitioner is seeking for the survey of the subject property and for demarcation of boundaries and for issuing sub-division patta to the petitioner within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2.Heard Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate for R1 to R3 and Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R4.

3.The petitioner is seeking right and title over the subject property by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 06.6.2024, registered as Document No.2322/2024.

4.The petitioner submitted an application on 20.8.2024 seeking for the survey of the subject property and for sub-division of the same and for issuance of sub-division patta in the name of the petitioner. Since the same was not considered a representation dated 27.09.2025 was made by the petitioner and the same also did not evoke any response. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition came to be filed before this Court.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to act upon the application submitted by the petitioner on 20.8.2024 and conduct the survey based on the title documents relied upon by the petitioner and thereafter, deal with the request made by the petitioner seeking for sub-division patta. The entire process shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. If there are any other interested parties, they shall be put on notice before a final decision is taken.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top