SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65463

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Ragu.A – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, The Registrar's Office, Marakkanam, Villupuram District. – Respondent
W.P.No.567 of 2020 | W.M.P.No.17655 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Raja Rajan, Mr.J.Antony Jesus
For the Respondents: Mr.M.S.Arasakumar

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request supported by appropriate endorsement.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India concerning a prayer for quashing Check Slip No.5 issued by the Sub Registrar which denied registration on grounds of the property being a wakf property. The court considered the endorsement for the withdrawal of the petition and consequently dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The ruling indicates the matter is concluded without costs.

Table of Content
1. petition is withdrawn based on legal endorsement. (Para 1)
2. court dismisses the writ petition as withdrawn. (Para 2)

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.567 of 2020 and W.M.P.No.17655 of 2024 Ragu.A ... Petitioner Vs.

The Sub Registrar, The Registrar's Office, Marakkanam, Villupuram District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records and Check Slip No.5 dated 18.11.2019 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal and directing the respondent to register the petitioner's Sale Deed dated 15.11.2019, if it is otherwise in order without rejecting it on the assertion that it is a wakf property.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja Rajan for Mr.J.Antony Jesus For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Arasakumar Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

2. Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed. 10.11.2025 vm Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking order To The Sub Registrar, The Registrar's Office, Marakkanam, Villupuram District.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

vm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top