IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
D.Selva Poorani – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector of Tenkasi – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners assert title to land in S.No.235/1A2A of the extent of 9 cents under sale deed dated 02.12.2009. The 7th respondent asserts title to land in the same survey number of an extent of 6 cents under sale deed dated 15.03.2021. On the ground that the said lands were not surveyed and that the errors in the FMB sketch were not rectified, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the FMB at page 57 of the typed set of papers and points out that this document erroneously depicts the property in S.No.235/6 in the mid eastern corner as that of the 7th respondent. Inspite of issuing survey notice and undertaking a survey, learned counsel contends that the boundaries of the petitioner's property have not been demarcated and that the errors in the FMB have not been corrected.
3. On the contrary, learned counsel for the 7th respondent relies upon sale deed dated 31.05.2000 in favour of the 7th respondent's vendor and the subsequent sale deed in favour of the 7th respondent dated 15.03.2021. Therefore, he contends that there is no error in the FMB at page No.57 of the typed set of papers.
4. Learned Special Government Pleader submits
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.