SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65470

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Arulananthasamy (Cook) – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to G – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.21220 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Radhakrishnan
For the Respondents:Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

The court mandated timely consideration of salary refixation and other benefits for similarly positioned individuals, emphasizing legal compliance in administrative decisions.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to refix salary and extend service benefits under G.O.(Ms) No.19, citing similar grants to others. The court directed the third respondent to consider the representation on the merits within ten weeks. The court refrained from expressing an opinion on the merits. Final orders are to be passed in accordance with law as per the proceedings related to similarly placed petitioners.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's entitlement for salary refixation based on precedent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court directs administrative action on merits. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to the respondents to refix the salary of the petitioner and extend the other service benefits to him in view of the implementation of G.O.(Ms) No.19, Backward Classes / Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Department, dated

07.03.2008, vide proceedings of the third respondent dated 05.01.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, two other persons, who are also Cooks, were granted the very same relief that is sought for in this writ petition by the respondents. The said persons have also filed writ petitions in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022.

Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the petitioner herein is a similarly placed person, the same relief will have to be granted to him also.

3. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if a direction is issued to them to consider the petitioner's representation seeking for the relief as sought for in this writ petition, in the light of the proceedings dated 04.11.2025 and 10.10.2025 issued in favour of the respective petitioners in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022 respectively.

4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation in the instant case and it is for the respondents to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2022, in the light of the proceedings dated 04.11.2025 and 10.10.2025 issued in favour of the respective petitioners in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022 respectively, who according to the petitioner, are identically placed persons, within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top