SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
P.Muthupandian – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government Backward Classes / Most Backward Classes / Minorities and De-notified Welfare Department – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.21223 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Radhakrishnan
For the Respondents:Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for salary refixation based on equal treatment principle.

Headnote:This case concerns a writ petition for mandamus under Article 226 due to the failure of the respondents to refix the salary and extend service benefits to the petitioner in line with G.O.Ms.No.19 dated 07.03.2008. The petitioner claims entitlement based on similar relief granted to others in writ petitions W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022. The court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2022 on merits. The order concludes with a direction to pass final orders within ten weeks from receipt of this order.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for salary refixation based on similar case precedents. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no prejudice to respondents if petitioner's representation is considered. (Para 3)
3. court directs timely consideration of the petitioner's representation. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to the respondents to refix the salary of the petitioner and extend the other service benefits to him in view of the implementation of G.O.(Ms) No.19, Backward Classes / Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Department, dated

07.03.2008, vide proceedings of the third respondent dated 05.01.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, two other persons, who are also Cooks, were granted the very same relief that is sought for in this writ petition by the respondents. The said persons have also filed writ petitions in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022.

Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the petitioner herein is a similarly placed person, the same relief will have to be granted to him also.

3. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents, if a direction is issued to them to consider the petitioner's representation seeking for the relief as sought for in this writ petition, in the light of the proceedings dated 04.11.2025 and 10.10.2025 issued in favour of the respective petitioners in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022 respectively.

4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation in the instant case and it is for the respondents to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2022, in the light of the proceedings dated 04.11.2025 and 10.10.2025 issued in favour of the respective petitioners in W.P.(MD) Nos.21219 & 21227 of 2022 respectively, who according to the petitioner, are identically placed persons, within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top