Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Abdul Quddhose, J
I.Kannan – Appellant
Versus
The General Manager, TNSTC – Nagercoil Region, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order regarding duty period. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue maintainability and factual disputes. (Para 3) |
| 3. court considers appropriate jurisdiction for industrial disputes. (Para 4) |
| 4. dismissal with direction to seek relief in labor court. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 04.12.2020 passed by the second respondent rejecting the petitioner's request to treat the 8 days ie., 22.10.2020, 24.10.2020, 31.10.2020, 05.11.2020, 11.11.2020, 12.11.2020, 16.11.2020 and 19.11.2020 as duty period and grant the service and monetary benefits in accordance with law.
2.The petitioner claims that on the aforementioned dates, the petitioner reported for duty but despite the same, the respondents have treated the aforesaid dates as loss of pay for the petitioner, which according to the petitioner is arbitrary and illegal. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation to the second respondent to treat the aforesaid dates as duty period which has been rejected under the impugned order dated 04.12.2020 passed by the second respondent.
3.Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents denying the contentions of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
