O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 04.12.2020 passed by the second respondent rejecting the petitioner's request to treat the 8 days ie., 22.10.2020, 24.10.2020, 31.10.2020, 05.11.2020, 11.11.2020, 12.11.2020, 16.11.2020 and 19.11.2020 as duty period and grant the service and monetary benefits in accordance with law.

2.The petitioner claims that on the aforementioned dates, the petitioner reported for duty but despite the same, the respondents have treated the aforesaid dates as loss of pay for the petitioner, which according to the petitioner is arbitrary and illegal. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation to the second respondent to treat the aforesaid dates as duty period which has been rejected under the impugned order dated 04.12.2020 passed by the second respondent.

3.Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents denying the contentions of the petitioner. They reiterate that the petitioner never reported for duty on the aforementioned dates and therefore, rightly the said period has been treated as loss of pay for the petitioner. They have also contended that this Writ Petition is not maintainable, since the dispute r