Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T.ASHA, J
A.Elango Arulrayan – Appellant
Versus
The Director, Office of the Director of Town and Country Planning – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for layout approval. (Para 1) |
| 2. approval request rejected; matter is dismissed. (Para 2) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct the respondent no.2 to approve lay out submitted by the petitioner now pending on the file of the 2nd respondent in accordance with law”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is informed that the request for approval has been rejected and an appeal has been filed.
Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
