SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65476

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Chellamani – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, O/o. the District Collector, Sivagangai District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.25558 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Praveenkumar
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Balasubramani

The revenue officials do not have jurisdiction to amend pre-UDR records under applicable administrative circulars.

Headnote:In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for the restoration of names deleted from the joint patta based on past records. The court finds that the revenue officials lack jurisdiction to amend pre-UDR records as per the circular dated 15.09.2023. The court disposes of the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to seek remedy in civil court.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request based on deletion of names. (Para 1)
2. revenue officials' authority in amendment is questioned. (Para 2)
3. court's decision to allow approach to civil court. (Para 3)

ORDER

On the ground that the name of the petitioner's grandfather late Mr.Sangili and the joint pattadhars were deleted from the SLR, after submitting a representation dated 14.06.2025, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that the revenue officials do not have the authority to consider any request for correction of errors in pre-UDR records. Therefore, he submits that the petitioner's request cannot be considered.

3. The Commissioner of Land Administration has issued a circular directing the revenue officials not to consider any request for correction of revenue records pertaining to pre-UDR period and has clarified that they do not have the authority or jurisdiction in this regard. Reference may be made in this connection to circular dated 15.09.2023 from the Commissioner of Land Administration. In view thereof, a mandamus as requested for by the petitioner cannot be issued. Therefore, by leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional civil court in accordance with law, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top