SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65477

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
M.Rajakumari – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, R.S.Mangalam Taluk Office, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District. – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.28283 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Iniyavan
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

The court affirmed the directive for the implementation of an administrative order within a specified timeframe to ensure legal compliance.

Headnote:The petitioner sought Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 to implement an order by the Revenue Divisional Officer for changing the patta name. The court noted no revision petition had been filed against this order. The court directed implementation within six weeks unless a stay was obtained, affirming the administrative efficiency in executing legal orders.

Table of Content
1. implementation of administrative order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. judicial confirmation of non-filing of revision petition. (Para 3)

ORDER

By relying on an order dated 07.07.2022 of the Revenue Divisional Officer regarding mutation of patta in the name of the petitioner's mother, by this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the implementation thereof.

2. At the last hearing, Mr.A.Arun Ramnath, learned counsel appeared on behalf of one Maruthu Pandian. He submitted that a revision petition was filed before the District Revenue Officer against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer. He sought for time to file an impleading petition. As on date, such impleading petition has not been numbered and listed before this court.

Mr.A.Arun Ramnath, learned counsel, is also not present today.

3. Learned Additional Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the order would be implemented within six weeks. He also confirms that he has not been informed of any revision petition being filed. 4. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Tahsildar to take necessary measures to implement the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order unless a stay order is obtained in proceedings against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer in the meantime. No costs.

10.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To The Tahsildar, R.S.Mangalam Taluk Office, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY , J.

RJR W.P.(MD)No.28283 of 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top