Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Mrs.T.K.Saradhamani Devi – Appellant
Versus
Dr.Perumal Raja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eviction grounded on tenancy must establish a valid lease. (Para 1 , 4 , 7) |
| 2. arguments contesting landlord's claim for possession. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court's findings on absence of landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. ruling based on applicability of the tnrrrlt act. (Para 11) |
| 5. final dismissal with opportunity for future claims under applicable provisions. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
The unsuccessful landlords who sought for recovery of possession before the Rent Court are the revision petitioners.
2. Heard Mr.GKR.Pandian, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.B.L.Jayakandan, learned counsel for the second respondent.
3. Mr.GKR.Pandian, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the Rent Court as well as Rent Tribunal have concurrently erred in dismissing the Application for recovery of possession filed under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (in short 'TNRRRLT Act, 2017/Act'). According to Mr.GKR.Pandian, the petitioners sought for evicting the respondents on the grounds of default in payment of rents and own use and occupation.
4. According to Mr.GKR.Pandian, even though the tenancy agreeme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
