Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Santha Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal concerns procedural questions regarding a significant delay in legal filing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the trial court's rationale for condoning the delay is questioned. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. lack of substantiation in the respondent's claims affects the case. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. adherence to procedural norms is essential for delay applications. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. the appeal's decision is based on the trial court's misapplication of discretion. (Para 11 , 12) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on:13.10.2025 Pronounced on: 07.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. Nos.4245 & 4248 of 2025 and CMP. Nos.21834 & 21831 of 2025 Kannan Petitioner in both Revisions Vs Santha Kumar Respondent in both Revisions COMMON PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code , to set aside the fair and decreetal order made in I.A. No.1 of 2023 & I.A. No.2 of 2023 in O.S. No.178 of 2013 dated 04.07.2025 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tirupathur.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramesh Vel in both Revisions For Respondent : Mr.Pa.Sudesh Kumar in both Revisions **********
COMMON ORDER
The Plaintiff in O.S. No.178 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
