IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI, J
C.Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
R.Vasantha – Respondent
ORDER
This revision has been filed seeking to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.36 of 2021 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.
2.I have heard Mr.ARL.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel for Mrs.Meenakshi Ganesan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.C.R.Prasanan, learned counsel for the 1st respondent. Though there is no appearance for the respondents 2 to 27, in the light of the fact that the 1st respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.36 of 2021 and the relief in the revision being only to strike off the plaint filed by the 1st respondent, the respondents 2 to 27 are only formal parties and hence, the hearing and disposal of the revision is not going to cause any prejudice to them.
3.Mr.ARL.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners would state that the present suit in O.S.No.36 of 2021 before the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore, is a clear abuse of process of law. In this regard, the learned Senior Counsel would invite my attention to an earlier suit filed in O.S.No.1407 of 2015. The said suit was filed by the 20th defendant in the present suit for partition. However, an application in I.A.No.269 of 2016 was taken out by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.