Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Sounthar, J
R.Anandhan – Appellant
Versus
Sasikala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's analysis on impleadment necessity. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioners and respondents. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the reasoning for dismissal of petition. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court allowing the application filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff seeking to implead the petitioners as party defendants in a suit.
2. The first respondent filed a suit for partition against her parents-in-
law. Pending suit, the first respondent acquired knowledge based on the reply notice issued by owner of the Sakthi Auto Gas. Thereafter, the petitioners got the certified copy of the sale deed dated 05-10-2016 and came to know that the petitioners herein purchased item 1 of the suit property. Therefore, the instant application has been filed to implead the petitioners as party defendants in a suit in their capacity as purchaser of item 1 of the suit property.
3. The petitioners filed counter-affidavit and resisted the application by supporting the title of the first defendant. It was the case of the petitioners that the suit property was allotted to first defendant in a family partition and hence, the same
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
