Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Anand Venkatesh, J
Southern Railway Rep.by The Chief Engineer (South) – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Sri N.Jayachandran M/s.Nilakantan and Son Pvt.Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute arose over contract completion and compensation claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's responsibility to evaluate the technical qualifications impacting rationale. (Para 5 , 6 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. the necessity of intelligible reasoning in arbitral awards. (Para 7 , 12) |
| 4. issues raised regarding inadequate reasoning in the award. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. outcome affirmed with the petition dismissed. (Para 34 , 35) |
ORDER
This Original Petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, herein after referred to as 'the Act') against the award dated 05.03.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.
2.The Respondent is a construction Company involved in infrastructure projects. They were awarded a contract relating to the work of construction of Bridge No.42 at km 82/6-7(5 x 19.2m) PSC Box girder and strengthening of existing substructure between Kuttakkudi-Pukkaravari stations as part of Cuddalore, Vriddhachalam-Salem gauge conversion project vide Agreement No. 168/CN/05 dated 03.06.2006. The project was to be completed within a period of eight months. However, due to various reasons, it was extended from time to time and ultimatel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
