SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65890

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J
Muthu S/o Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) – Respondent
WP No. 41307 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Madhan Raj
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Thirunavukarasu for R1 and R2

Judicial review allows the court to ensure that administrative bodies act within reasonable timeframes in response to petitions.

Headnote:This Writ of Mandamus sought to compel the respondents to effectuate a name change for the petitioner's son in his Aadhaar records (paragraph 1). The court addressed the issue of administrative delay in processing the request due to the necessity of additional documentation (paragraphs 2-3). The court directed the responsible authorities to evaluate the petitioner's representation and issue appropriate orders within six weeks (paragraphs 6-7).

Table of Content
1. application for name change in aadhaar (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. procedural compliance from respondents (Para 4)
3. court directed prompt action on representation (Para 5)

PRAYER This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to make necessary changes in the name of Aadhaar of the petitioner's minor child from M. Pragathan to M. Prajan and consequently direct the 4th respondent to make necessary entries in School Records of Minor M. PRAJAN ( formerly M. PRAGATHAN) based on the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Madhan Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Thirunavukarasu for R1 and R2

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to make necessary changes in the name of Aadhaar of the petitioner's minor child from M.Pragathan to M.Prajan and consequently direct the 4th respondent to make necessary entries in School Records of Minor M.Prajan (formerly M. Pragathan) based on the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2025.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had changed his elder son's name from M.Pragathan to M.Prajan as per numerology and the same was published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 07.09.2016. The petitioner thereafter approached the third respondent to make necessary correction in the name of his child in the Aadhaar Card with original documents such as Aadhaar Card, Birth Certificate, Gazette Notification and Community Certificate. However, the third respondent insisted on production of Nativity Certificate for name change in the Aadhar Card of the petitioner's son.

3.Thereafter, the petitioner approached the Revenue Authorities seeking Nativity Certificate, but, they denied to issue the same in the old name of the petitioner's son, since the name got changed. The petitioner thereafter sent an e-mail on 26.07.2025 to the respondents informing about the inability of the petitioner in producing the nativity certificate and a reply, too was given to the petitioner that the respondents would look into the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 15.10.2025 to the respondents 1 to 3 to change the name of the petitioner's son in the Aadhar card, which has not been considered by the respondents till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

4.The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered by the respondents within a time fixed by this Court and accordingly, prays for appropriate orders.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.

6.In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents

1 to 3 are now directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2025 and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six (6)

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

7.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top