Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. R.N.MANJULA, J
Dr.Vasantha Rajamanickam – Appellant
Versus
Indira Devaraj Bhat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's decision to return documents with undertakings (Para 9 , 9) |
| 2. request for return of original documents for auditing (Para 1 , 2) |
| 3. discussion on relevance and custody of documents (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling and procedural order (Para 10) |
9.S.Ramesh Kumar ... Respondents Prayer : This application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order XIII Rule 9 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure , to direct the Registry to return the original plaint document Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 15 filed by the plaintiff in C.S. No.
955 of 2017 and substitute the same with certified copy of the same.
For applicant : M/s.R.Ramya For Respondents : M/s.F.Kamal Baig (D9)
Mr.T.M.Mano (D10)
Mr.M.Nandakumar (D3)
Mr.M.Jawahar (D1)
O R D E R
The application has been filed to return the original plaint document Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 15 filed by the plaintiff in C.S. No.
955 of 2017 and substitute the same with certified copies of the same.
2. The learned counsel for the applicant /plaintiff submitted that the above documents mentioned in the Judges Summons are required for the purpose of auditing and for the above purpose,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
