Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
Arvind Subramanyan – Appellant
Versus
State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Tirunelveli. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the petitioner’s complaint regarding bribery and subsequent actions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. details of the enquiry conducted and findings regarding insufficiency of evidence. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. discussion on the legal requirement for sanction prior to investigation. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. ruling on the dismissal of the petition based on lack of merit. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.154 of 2024, dated 03.04.2025 on the file of the learned Special Judge, Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases, Tirunelveli, dismissing the petition filed under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of 15 flats in Luxuriya Apartments, located at 10, Madurai Road, Tirunelveli Junction and out of 15 Flats, he already sold 6 flats to individual buyers and is holding the remaining 9 flats. The second respondent purchased Flat No.6 from the revision petitioner and he approached the petitioner and offered to take steps with Corporation for getting the drinking water connection for the apartment.
3. The petitioner agreed to the second respondent's
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
