IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Thamizh Nadu Brahmin Association – Appellant
Versus
Central Board of Film Certification – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to film certification under legal statutes. (Para 1) |
| 2. changes in film title led to mootness of the case. (Para 2) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the certificate of public exhibition for the film "MADISAR MAMI, issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 5A of the Cinematograph Act and consequently, directing the respondents 3 to 6 not to exhibit the said film in any theater, auditorium, place of public exhibition etc., in any manner in whatever and in any form of public exhibition in any place.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, as per the direction issued by this Court vide order dated 27.05.2013, the title of the movie has been changed and the said movie has also been released. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter, and hence, this writ petition is closed. However, if the movie is published with the objectionable items, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.