IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
C.Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
1.Chockalingam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
The appellants/plaintiff in O.S.No.49 of 2006 has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.61 of 2016 on the file of the the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, wherein the respondents/defendants herein have filed an appeal against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.49 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, and the appeal was dismissed by confirming dismissal order passed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff.
2. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties herein after will be referred to as per their status/ranking before the trial Court.
3. The brief averments made in the plaint are as follows:-
The father of the plaintiff namely, Chandrasekaran and the first defendant are brothers. The defendants 2 & 3 are the purchaser of the suit schedule property from the first defendant. The grand father of the plaintiff name is Ramachandran. He has 5 sons and two daughters including the father of the plaintiff and the first defendant. He was the owner of the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.