Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J
R.K.Sarathkumaran – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scope of petitioners' claims regarding the break fee. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by petitioners against illegal fees. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial observations on educational fee regulation. (Para 7 , 9 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. court's directive against unauthorized fee collection. (Para 20) |
| 5. closure of the case with directions for compliance. (Para 21) |
COMMON ORDER
All the Writ Petitions have been filed to direct the respondents to implement the fee structure prescribed by the Fee Fixation Committee and to direct the respondents/College not to charge additional tuition fee in the form of Break Fee/miscellaneous fee and to release the original educational certificate to all the petitioners to pursue their further career.
2. The issues involved in all these Writ Petitions are similar in nature and therefore this Court is inclined to pass a common order.
3. All the petitioners had joined in the Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (Deemed to be University) (hereinafter referred to as “the CARE University”) in the academic year 2014-15, 2017-18 & 2018-19 in the MBBS course under the management quota. They passed all the examinations conducted by the CARE University in nine s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
